A
rural chief who had already died has been left without a burial as his
wives fight a bitter battle over who has the right to bury him.
File photo: Mortuary
Chief Bagcine Mkhono, a South African, rural chief’s body is lying
in a cold mortuary five months after his death – because his two wives
are involved in a bitter legal battle over the right to bury him, Daily
Sun SA, reports.
The late chief Mkhono died in November. At the time of his death, he was living with his second wife, Nonzwakazi.
Last year – just a day before his funeral – the chief’s first wife,
Noncedile, contested the legality of the second wife by taking her to
court.
She is demanding to bury her husband as per custom. However, the
second wife is refusing to hand over the body, claiming that the chief’s
dying wish was to be buried by her.
Noncedile took the matter to the Mthatha High Court. She is
alleging that the will and marriage certificate that Nonzwakazi produced
are both fake. Noncedile claims the will was signed on 13 November
although the chief had died on 7 November.
The Mthatha High Court heard the matter on Monday. Villagers from
Mchonkco in Ngqeleni travelled to the high court. They sang and chanted
outside, split in their support.
The chief was said to be legally married to Noncedile and later took Nonzwakazi as his second wife, according to customary law.
A saddened elder from the village who attended the court, madala
Mcingelwa Mnqunqu (76), said they were heartbroken by the situation
which has destroyed the peace in the area.
“We have tried to talk to Nonzwakazi about this but she claims she is just following the last wishes of the late chief,” said Mnqunqu.
Advocate Mwelo Nonkonyana who is representing Noncedile said they
are questioning the validity of the second marriage as well as the will
left by Chief Bagcine.
“It will be in the interests of justice to solve this matter as
soon as possible as the body of the deceased has spent five months in
the mortuary,” said Nonkonyana.
The chief’s children have declined to comment until judgment is passed.
The case was postponed to 12 May.
0 COMMENTS:
Post a Comment